Many of us in the Sungevity community made Earth Day resolutions to reduce our carbon footprints.  But will our green resolutions go the way of our New Year’s resolutions, with a few false starts and then a slow fade to oblivion?  Probably.  Unless we harness the power of peer pressure to hold us accountable.  Behavioral research consistently shows that people overcome unhealthy habits when they are accountable to a social group whom they trust and respect–that’s why AA works and why people who learn that they’re using more electricity than their neighbors find ways to lower their bills.

To help keep us honest, the Ecology Center is offering a Climate Change Action Workshop Series beginning May 3 and running every Monday evening for four weeks.  You’ll learn what steps you can take as an individual consumer and as part of a community committed to curbing climate change.  If you can’t attend the workshops, the Ecology Center can help you facilitate your own group of ten or more individuals through your neighborhood, place of worship, workplace or school.  Or use the comment feature below to share your resolution–we’ll check back with you in a few months to see how it’s going.

–Erica Etelson

Your peers may be more influenced by your miserly ways than you realize.  Utilities, including SMUD in Sacramento, Opower in Virginia and National Grid in the Northeast, have discovered that when they show their customers how their energy usage compares with that of their neighbors, usage drops.  Information about how much energy others are using, especially information showing that others are taking steps to conserve energy, seems to exert peer pressure to conserve.  No one wants to be seen as the neighborhood energy hog.

An Opower customer’s bill contains a bar graph like this:

The utilities’ peer pressure strategy is informed by advances in behavioral sciences that seek to understand what motivates individuals to change their energy use patterns.  In the March 2010 issue of Science, researchers from MIT and Harvard report that the cost of programs designed to encourage individuals to conserve energy pales in comparison with the cost of other greenhouse gas reduction tactics.  Eliminating a metric ton of CO₂ with wind power, for example, costs $20; carbon capture at coal-fired power plants:  $44; behavior nudging programs:  -$165 (notice the negative sign there?).

One might think that with savings like that, the federal government would be falling over itself in its haste to ramp up programs aimed at improving individuals’ energy habits.  But when Congressman Brian Baird (D-WA) proposed a modest $10 million Department of Energy program to simply study the prospects, talk radio host Glenn Beck warned of government mind control, and the bill was scrapped.

But the nudge strategy isn’t going away so fast.  Slate is running an “Efficient Life” contest where you can submit your favorite energy-saving ideas and vote on ideas others have posted.

So yes, keep up the good work-tighter windows, smaller TVs, warmer sweaters-just be sure to tell everyone all about it.

–Erica Etelson